Posts about evidence, logic, and rational thinking
Why Pseudoscience Imitates Science Instead of Replacing It There is a peculiar contradiction at the heart of modern religious pseudoscience. Those who claim to reject science routinely borrow its authority.Those who dismiss scientific institutions cling to scientific titles.Those who argue that evidence is unnecessary work tirelessly to look evidential. This is not accidental. It reveals […]
Degrees, Data and Deception Read Post »
Why the Watchmaker Analogy Fails Before It Even Begins Few arguments against evolution spread as easily as the image of a man shaking a bag of watch parts, yawning while he waits for a Rolex to assemble itself. The caption varies, but the message is always the same: if a watch cannot assemble by chance,
Shaking Watches and Shaking Hands With Ignorance Read Post »
A Thought Experiment on Divine Irrelevance This is not an argument for god.It is a controlled thought experiment. For the sake of analysis only, let us assume that a god exists and triggered the universe into being. We will not argue for this claim, defend it, or attempt to make it plausible. We grant it
God, Granted for a Moment Read Post »
Or: How to Lose an Argument While Thinking You’ve Won It Every attack on evolution from a religious standpoint follows the same path. Not broadly. Not loosely. Mechanically. Different authors, different platforms, same manoeuvres. Same misunderstandings. Same end point. Once you see it, you cannot unsee it. The argument ceases to look like reasoning and
The Five-Step Creationist Script Read Post »
One of the most common religious challenges to evolutionary biology is framed as a simple demand: “Show me where a new kind was created.” It is often presented as a scientific objection. It is not. The argument depends on a term that has no standing in biology, no agreed definition, and no measurable boundary. “Kind”
The Myth of “Kinds”: Why This Religious Idea Exists, Why It Fails, and Why It Matters Read Post »
Human civilisation is now so accustomed to advanced technology that we forget how astonishing it truly is. A smartphone contains billions of transistors. A modern processor performs billions of operations every second. Artificial intelligence platforms analyse language, recognise patterns, and predict outcomes at scales that exceed human capacity. Yet if you placed humanity’s most brilliant
Introduction: Two Ways of Knowing Since the dawn of thought, humanity has sought to explain the world around it. Before the language of atoms, there was the language of gods. Lightning became anger, illness became punishment, and existence itself was a story told to calm fear. Then came evidence. The scientific method transformed explanation into
Science vs Religion: Why Evidence Outweighs Faith Read Post »
Introduction: The Final Mystery Religion has spent centuries retreating from the expanding frontier of human knowledge. When thunder was unexplained, it was a god’s anger. When disease spread, it was punishment. When life diversified, it was divine design. Each time, science switched on the light and the shadows fled. Today, the final shadow is the
From Molecules to Meaning: How Abiogenesis Will Pull the Last Rug from Under Religion Read Post »
Foreword Across Facebook and YouTube, a new style of creationist content has taken hold. It sounds calm. It uses scientific vocabulary. It sprinkles in fossils, volcanoes, salinity, even the word “isotope”. Then, after the polite tour, it reveals the destination: “This is consistent with Noah’s Flood.” It is not science. It is theology in a
The Flood Myth, Why It’s Good It Never Happened Read Post »
1. What Atheism Actually Means The claim that “atheists believe everything came from nothing” is one of the most repeated but least accurate arguments used against non-believers. It is catchy, confident, and completely wrong. To dismantle it, one must start at the beginning: what atheism actually is. Atheism is the absence of belief in gods
Atheists Don’t Believe Everything Came From Nothing Read Post »
