Is the Earth Really 4.5 Billion Years Old?
Young-earth creationism vs. the evidence: radiometric dating, ice cores, varves, and why every independent method agrees on 4.54 billion years.
Is the Earth Really 4.5 Billion Years Old? Read Post »
Evidence, logic and the habit of thinking clearly. These articles set out how science explains the world without appeal to the supernatural, why reason and the burden of proof matter, and how rational enquiry has steadily filled the gaps that gods once occupied.
Young-earth creationism vs. the evidence: radiometric dating, ice cores, varves, and why every independent method agrees on 4.54 billion years.
Is the Earth Really 4.5 Billion Years Old? Read Post »
The creationist claim that transitional fossils do not exist is demonstrably false. Here is the evidence, in four of the strongest sequences palaeontology has produced.
Do transitional fossils actually exist? Read Post »
Creationists insist a sharp boundary separates humans from apes. Their own experts cannot agree where it falls. The fossil and genomic evidence explains why.
Where Exactly Is the Ape-Human Line? Read Post »
Creationists concede microevolution then deny macroevolution. This essay shows why that distinction is a theological boundary marker, not a scientific one.
Is macroevolution just microevolution over time? Read Post »
Faith borrows the language of science while dodging its rules. A weakness in one theory is not a god. Still missing the one thing: evidence of God.
Bringing a Pea Shooter to a Knife Fight Read Post »
Why religious pseudoscience borrows scientific titles, language and authority it refuses to earn: a forensic look at fake expertise and credential laundering.
Degrees, Data and Deception Read Post »
The watchmaker argument claims evolution is impossible because a watch cannot assemble by chance. This piece exposes its fatal biological errors.
Shaking Watches and Shaking Hands With Ignorance Read Post »
If a god exists but never intervenes, does it matter? A rigorous thought experiment examining divine irrelevance from deep time to modern history, without scripture or revelation.
God, Granted for a Moment Read Post »
Creationist arguments against evolution follow one five step script: find a gap, inflate it, freeze science, insert God, call it faith. Why it fails.
The Five-Step Creationist Script Read Post »
Why the religious argument against evolution built on biblical kinds fails as science and as theology, and why the boundary is never actually defined.
The Myth of “Kinds”: Why This Religious Idea Exists, Why It Fails, and Why It Matters Read Post »