Does the CMB Actually Confirm Genesis?
Creationists claim the cosmic microwave background confirms Genesis. Here is what the Planck satellite actually found, and why the argument fails completely.
Does the CMB Actually Confirm Genesis? Read Post »
Evidence, logic and the habit of thinking clearly. These articles set out how science explains the world without appeal to the supernatural, why reason and the burden of proof matter, and how rational enquiry has steadily filled the gaps that gods once occupied.
Creationists claim the cosmic microwave background confirms Genesis. Here is what the Planck satellite actually found, and why the argument fails completely.
Does the CMB Actually Confirm Genesis? Read Post »
Ken Ham’s ‘Were you there?’ challenge sounds like scepticism but collapses under scrutiny. Here’s why historical science is genuine science.
Does ‘Were You There?’ Actually Prove Anything? Read Post »
The largest ever controlled trial of intercessory prayer found no effect. Here is what the STEP study did, what it found, and why nobody changed their minds.
The Prayer Study That Changed Nothing Read Post »
The ontological argument claims God exists by definition alone. Here is why that move fails, from Anselm and Kant to Plantinga’s modal logic.
Can You Think God Into Existence? Read Post »
Young-earth creationism vs. the evidence: radiometric dating, ice cores, varves, and why every independent method agrees on 4.54 billion years.
Is the Earth Really 4.5 Billion Years Old? Read Post »
The creationist claim that transitional fossils do not exist is demonstrably false. Here is the evidence, in four of the strongest sequences palaeontology has produced.
Do transitional fossils actually exist? Read Post »
Creationists insist a sharp boundary separates humans from apes. Their own experts cannot agree where it falls. The fossil and genomic evidence explains why.
Where Exactly Is the Ape-Human Line? Read Post »
Creationists concede microevolution then deny macroevolution. This essay shows why that distinction is a theological boundary marker, not a scientific one.
Is macroevolution just microevolution over time? Read Post »
Faith borrows the language of science while dodging its rules. A weakness in one theory is not a god. Still missing the one thing: evidence of God.
Bringing a Pea Shooter to a Knife Fight Read Post »
Why religious pseudoscience borrows scientific titles, language and authority it refuses to earn: a forensic look at fake expertise and credential laundering.
Degrees, Data and Deception Read Post »